The latest chapter in the continuing soap-opera known as University Hospital was unveiled today, as Kentucky State Auditor Adam Edelen released an examination of the Quality and Charity Care Trust (QCCT); finding a lack of oversight of a fund responsible for annually disbursing more than $30 million in state and local indigent care money to University Hospital in Louisville.
The exam found that the board structure was not suited for proper oversight, the agreement between University Medical Center (UMC) and state and local government to administer the money is outdated, and administrative processes failed to provide sufficient details for determining compliance with the agreement. Specifically, UMC did not have sufficient recordkeeping to support its claim that indigent care costs are derived from patients who met pre-defined criteria for indigence or medically needy. Auditors found no evidence that taxpayer dollars were abused.
“I applaud University of Louisville President James Ramsey for asking us to take a look at QCCT and acknowledge the good work the University does in caring for the indigent population,” Edelen said. Questions had been raised in the media about the trust’s board, which had not been conducting regular meetings as required by its by-laws.
The trust collects about $25 million a year from the state and $7 million a year from Louisville Metro Government and uses it to help cover University Hospital’s cost of treating indigents.
“The responsibility for providing a safety-net for our most vulnerable is a critical one shared by the University, City and Commonwealth,” Edelen said. “While this audit underscores the need for modernization and reform of the governing structure, it does not provide justification for those who desire a retreat from that mission.”
The purpose of the examination was to ensure appropriate processes are in place to provide strong oversight of QCCT funds through a review of the QCCT board and UMC’s policies, QCCT board governance, University of Louisville and QCCT internal controls and financial transactions relating to QCCT. Six of the report’s nine findings deal with weaknesses relating to the QCCT’s board structure.
Auditors found that U of L has significant influence over the QCCT board and that because it administers the funds, this structure extends its management function rather than providing accountability. Edelen recommends appointments for the controlling number of board members be given to the Commonwealth and Louisville Metro.
Auditors also found that the board failed to meet as required by the QCCT bylaws, conducted meetings that were not effective for proper oversight, lacked written policies and procedures, did not have sufficient communication with the audit firm, and did not review or approve the annual funding calculation.
The exam found that QCCT does not have an updated agreement in place. The existing QCCT structure is largely the product of a 1983 agreement – one that has not been substantially updated despite changes in stakeholders and the merger of the Louisville and Jefferson County governments. It also doesn’t specify whether the intent is to provide funding for specific individuals or to provide funding to UMC for general use to support the indigent care program.
Edelen recommends the agreement be updated to address the current parties and all funding arrangements, require funding be applied to individual patient accounts, clarify the residency requirements, reflect that reimbursement should be based on cost and address the intent of the funding.
“It is my hope that the stakeholders sit down and draft a new agreement that better reflects the core mission of the fund, which is to provide care for our most vulnerable citizens,” Edelen said. “It should be a deal that is fair to taxpayers and an institution that carries a heavy burden of treating thousands of indigents each year.”
Auditors also found that QCCT funds are not accounted for at the patient level. The agreement does not make clear that the funds should be applied to individual patient accounts, but it does stipulate that the local government’s funding should be used to provide care for indigents who are residents of Jefferson County. Edelen recommends UMC apply QCCT funds to specific patient accounts to allow greater accountability.
In addition, auditors found that the indigent care log does not provide adequate information for proper accountability of QCCT funds. UMC did not require indigents to verify their income, making it difficult to ensure that QCCT funds were not being applied to non-indigents’ accounts.
“Indigents and individuals who have the means but fail to pay should not be lumped in the same category as it relates to the QCCT fund,” Edelen said.
CLICK HERE to receive a copy of the full report (44 Pp., .PDF)
Louisville.com's The Arena section features opinions from active participants in the city's politics. Their viewpoints are not those of Louisville.com (a website is an inanimate object and, as such, has no opinions). The Arena is read by more people in Louisville than in any other city in America.
|Richie Farmer is now, truly, ‘unforgettable’ [Opinion: The Arena]|
|Louisville’s love affair with Hugh Haynie|
|Governor fires CHFS director; is Tina Heavrin next? [Opinion: The Arena]|
|Metro Councilman David James helping to improve Central Park [Opinion: The Arena]|
|After 44 years of service to Louisville, Bill Summers is retiring [Opinion: The Arena]|
|Unions picket Louisville’s Metro Hall [Opinion: The Arena]|
|Louisville mayor’s second State of the City speech [Opinion: The Arena]|