79°F12:55 AM
Louisville’s new mayor, Greg Fischer, delivered today on one of his main campaign promises: He appointed Louisville Metro Government’s first Director of Sustainability. And, no, it wasn’t Jackie Green; it was a woman named Maria Koetter.
“Having a point-person for sustainability will not only lead to cost-saving efficiencies in city government, it will help make Louisville a more environmentally-friendly city and serve as an economic development tool by attracting new green industries and jobs,” Fischer said. “Maria has the corporate, regulatory and community background to be an effective leader on this front.”
According to her résumé, Koetter worked for 10 years with the California-based firm Tetra Tech EM Inc., where she managed a variety of environmental projects and initiatives. She also served as “project scientist” for ERD Environmental Inc., involved with soil, water, air and wastewater assessment and cleanup efforts and working closely with the EPA and local and state regulators. She supervised what are called “USGBC LEED green building projects.”
LEED is a set of building guidelines, created by the United States Green Building Council (USGBC), that can supposedly determine how “green” your building is. LEED stands for Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design. It was established in 1998 and is a green building rating system that awards “silver, gold, and platinum” certificates for new or remodeled structures. LEED “points” are given for such things as solar energy panels or having a bike rack near the front entrance.
On her Linkedin web page, Koetter bills herself as “President, Principal Scientist” for a “green” consulting operation she calls “Bgreen2 LLC.” Her educational background consists of a 1989 bachelors degree in Biology and Secondary Education, from Western Kentucky University (formerly known as Western Kentucky State Teachers College). She has a Teaching Certificate in General Science.
Without a Masters Degree, Koetter could expect to earn around $40k as a Jefferson County General Science teacher. As Louisville’s Director of Sustainability she will start out at $78,000 a year. If she is to be provided with an office and a staff, the taxpayers can look forward to a yearly outlay of a couple of hundred grand, so that Louisville can claim to be interested in “sustainability.”
Readers will recall that back in October of 2010—during the hotly contested mayoral campaign—environmentalist Jackie Green suddenly dropped out of the race and threw his support to Fischer, the ultimate winner. Courier-Journal reporter Dan Klepal broke the story with a suggestion that Green was trying to cut a deal with Fischer which would involve Green’s dropping out of the mayoral race and throwing his support to the Democrat. In return, Klepal predicted that Fischer would promise to appoint Green to a new position as Louisville’s “Sustainability Czar,” once he became mayor.
Green told Kelpal he wanted “significant” input in picking the leader of the Office of Sustainability that would be created in a Fischer administration. Green said he also wanted an assurance that the office will have “authority and priority” in a Fischer administration. He allowed as how he, himself, “may be the best person to run the office.”
Of course, the local alternative press went ballistic over l’affaire Green. Writing in the Louisville City Hall Examiner, we reminded readers that Kentucky Revised Statute 121.055 makes it illegal for any political candidate to promise a job—or any other thing of value—in return for a vote or other support. Violation of this statute can bring a $10,000 fine, and is a Class D felony, punishable by 1 to 5 years in prison. More that a little bit snarky, we observed: “It’s one thing to copy Hal Heiner’s platform, in an effort to appear more main-stream and moderate. It’s quite another thing to conspire with an environmental whacko like Jackie Green to cut a deal for a pay-off that could land them both behind bars.”
The thrust of our argument, however, was that Green’s public statements on the “Office of Sustainability” promised by Fischer came awfully close to the line of violating the law. More facts needed to come out, before we would be willing to turn the key in the cell door.
Not so, however, in the rest of the local political blogosphere. Jake Payne, over at the ‘Ville Voice, concluded: “Looks like Greg Fischer broke state law in promising a job to Jackie Green in exchange for his endorsement.” Jake don’t beat around the bush.
Ed Springston, at Louisville News and Politics, has Green and Fischer practically behind bars: “Mayoral candidate Greg Fischer in his quest to do anything to get elected has violated the law with his deal for Jackie Green to drop out and endorse him. Fischer should be disqualified and charges are forthcoming. Green will be charged as well.” No ambivalence here.
Over at Louisville Courant, Curtis Morrison threw down the gauntlet: “Newsflash: If Jackie's out, then I'm with Hal. For all the homosexuals that plan to threaten and harass me for the next three weeks, bring it. I will not be intimidated from speaking my mind.”
And Republican mayoral candidate Hal Heiner jumped into the fray, issuing a press release, suggesting that, “In order to get his political opponent, Jackie Green, out of the race, he entered into written negotiations to turn over the power and authority of a new government agency in exchange for political support.” Heiner called upon the Fischer campaign to “…release all documents drafted between the Fischer and Green campaigns so that the public can see exactly what they’re paying for. We should never forget government exists to serve the people, not the self interest of a political campaign”
Czar?
The writing of this editorial smacks of old school mis-information and narrow-minded agenda.
It's time that everyone wake up to the scientific realities of what's happening with climate change and what role we all may play in mitigating the potential for disaster.
Maria Koetter's focus, intelligence and passion will deliver a high impact yield for our fledgling Office of Sustainability. She is an expert in this category and there are many opportunities Louisville has for assessment and improvement on our nascent path toward being better stewards of our energy and environmental resources and dollars.
In my opinion, your editorial borders on slander and is woefully misguided.
Ah...if only you'd had a
Ah...if only you'd had a competent high school general science teacher, Thomas.
Sustainability is important. And even though Koetter has a history with Shell Oil and Halliburton, and like everyone Tommy Elliott has told him to hire, is one of Fischer's campaign contributors, I still wish her well and support her in ANYTHING she does to make our city more sustainable. BTW, Do you think you'll fit in one of those 95 gallon orange recycling cans?
Really?
Thank you for including so much info from actual writers and reporters on this "story." From now on I can just read them and skip ove ryour useless rant. You offer nothing original--not only do you copy-and-paste a third of the piece, you rehash the entire election-past news-that-went-nowhere, as if it IS going somewhere--then add that it came to nothing. It is one thing to be conservative. It is quite another to be divisive and snarky merely because of your party affiliation. Why not embrace the opportunity we have with this new office and its new leader. And CERTAINLY hold her, the office, and the mayor to the fire if it goes awry. Unfortunately, you've shown your true colors and can't be taken seriously on this matter, Anything you "report," or "opine" in the future is colored with your obvious slant. You clearly want it to fail.
Party Affiliation
In case you were wondering, I have been a registered Democrat for more than 50 years, and I believe Greg Fischer has done a fantastic job during his first year as Louisville's mayor. But "sustainability" is one of those nonsensical but trendy ideas--like "diversity," "organic," and "living wage"--which leftists like to peddle to the ignorant and uninformed. Sustainability is a total and complete scam, and is a waste of the taxpayers money.
Thomas, I have to
Thomas,
I have to respectively disagree. As a practicing Energy Consultant and Certified Energy Manager (CEM) working in Ky I have seen numerous "sustainability strategies" that make great business sense with short returns on investment (ROI) of 1 - 3 years (try to find that rate of return anywhere else). It is the over generalization and misuse of terms such as "diversity", "organic" and "green" that has led to a poor understanding of the true essence of sustainability and its power to help our economy and make us more competitive globally with Europe and Asia.
Earth to Thomas...
Sustainability is a neo-Marxist wha????
Get a grip!
:-)